Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



FINRA & MSRB Embrace Economics

| No Comments

September was a big month for economic analysis by financial regulators. On September 19, 2013, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority--a quasi-governmental regulatory organization--issued a statement on "economic impact assessment for proposed rulemaking." A week later, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board--another quasi-governmental regulator--announced that it had adopted a "policy for integrating economic analysis in rulemaking process." These announcements are important because, to date, neither regulator has made systematic use of economic analysis in its rulemaking.

FINRA, which is the front-line regulator for securities firms, has pledged to ask a series of questions in connection with "significant" proposed rules. Specifically, it will try to identify the reason for taking regulatory action, the objective of the proposal, the baseline against which to measure the effects of the proposed regulation, how the proposed rule will work, reasonable alternatives to the proposal, and the economic impacts of the different options. The MSRB, which is the front-line regulator for the municipal securities markets, will take a similar, although not identical, approach. Both approaches are broadly modeled on the staff guidance now used by the Securities and Exchange Commission in its rulemakings. The SEC, in turn, relies--albeit with some modifications--on the guidelines that govern economic analysis by executive branch agencies.

Judging from the SEC's experience, embracing economic analysis can be a slow, difficult, and uncomfortable process. Nevertheless, the fact that these two quasi-governmental regulators have taken a step towards employing this common-sense tool in their rulemaking is positive. It will enable the SEC to conduct its approval process for FINRA and MSRB rules in a manner that is consistent with the SEC's legal responsibility to consider the effect of rules on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. Other financial regulators should follow the lead of the SEC, FINRA, and the MSRB and formally incorporate economic analysis into their rulemaking.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.