Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



"Family-friendly law firms"

| No Comments

An Above the Law tweet suggests "If you want a hope of any work/life balance, this list matters." The list is that produced by the Yale Law Women of the supposedly top "family-friendly law firms." But it's hard to see why this list matters. One presumably goes to a law firm for more than a year, but the turnover on the Yale law list is 50% from year to year, and even more over two years. Picking a firm now because it's supposedly so family-friendly appears to be a random crapshoot whether one will end up at a firm that is "family-friendly" when one graduates law school. And that's before the paradox that the Yale Law Women list only somewhat overlaps with the one created by "Working Mother and Flex-Time Lawyers." Anyone choosing a large law firm because they're looking for a family-friendly environment is setting themselves up for disappointment. It's the rare law firm that doesn't rejigger its requirements and expectations for associates at least once in a five-year period; getting named to the Yale Law Women list is no prediction of whether an associate will be disgruntled enough to sue over lack of family-friendliness. BigLaw pays the salary that it does because it can bill the rates that it does, and it can bill the rates that it does because its clients expect the firm to jump at a moment's notice and work around the clock when needed. The associates who do that are always going to have an advantage over the 9-to-5-ers, in experience if nothing else; the associates with that experience and skillset are going to be much more able to negotiate for a good job outside of BigLaw that accommodates their desire for work-life balance years down the road.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.