Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



Fraley v. Facebook update

| 1 Comment

We previously discussed the settlement in Fraley v. Facebook, and my skepticism of it. It seems to be worse than originally thought, and there have been some interesting developments:

  • The lawyers will be collecting $10 million for generating $10 million in cy pres. They seek to rationalize this by claiming over $100 million in "benefits" from injunctive relief—but of course, they represent a class seeking compensation for past injury, so prospective injunctive relief doesn't solve that issue. Even assuming that the nine-digit figure had any bearing on reality, when it doesn't: it's based on purported cost to Facebook, but cost to Facebook is not "benefit" to the class, any more than it would be if Facebook set $100 million ablaze in a bonfire.
  • I was much amused to see which plaintiffs' firm intervened to complain about the size of the settlement: the one and only Korein Tillery, who doesn't have such a great track record of treating its putative class clients fairly in the course of their Madison County dealings. The court should require the attorneys to put their money where their mouth is, and use an auction mechanism to see which class counsel will promise the best deal for the class for the least amount of attorneys' fees. Some disclosure about previous results in class-action settlements would be of interest, too. Korein cited to Bluetooth, which makes my heart proud.
  • Daniel Fisher reports that the cy pres recipients are suspiciously tied to Facebook. I'm quoted: "If Facebook is already giving money to these charities, then this isn't a '$10 million settlement,' it's just a change in accounting entries." Moreover, "It's surprising that, in a settlement involving Facebook users, i.e., people who are actively on the Internet, that objecting and opting out are only possible by jumping through hoops involving paper and the Post Office."
  • It turns out that Judge Koh has a series of affiliations (some more strained than others) with some of the proposed cy pres recipients; this is perhaps why she recused herself. (I previously argued that similar ties required recusal, but, if this is why Koh recused, it is the first time I've seen a judge do so. The chief judge of the same district was happy to reallocate cy pres money to his favorite charity.) This suggests a possible problem with cy pres: not just the conflict of interest with a judge, but the fact that parties can effectively judge-shop by selecting cy pres recipients that would force recusal. Judges can prevent this by issuing a standing order forbidding proposing cy pres settlements that provide money to charities affiliated with the judge. But now Judge Koh will not be deciding whether the settlement is fair, and it's far from clear her replacement will be as conscientious of the class's interests.

1 Comment

facebook should not use private photos of anyone

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.