Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



IP Colloquium/UCLA podcast: Tenenbaum case (RIAA/Nesson)

The Intellectual Property Colloquium, in conjunction with UCLA School of Law, makes available a podcast series of which the latest may be of particular interest not only because of the enduring interest of the RIAA file-sharing litigation but also because of the questions it raises over the constitutional status of punitive damages:

Joel Tenenbaum looks a lot like every other defendant who has been accused by the music industry of illegally sharing copyrighted work online, but with one key difference: his defense attorney is Harvard Law School Professor Charlie Nesson, and Nesson is out to turn his case into a public referendum not only on the music industry's efforts to enforce copyright through these direct-infringer suits, but also on the copyright rules that make the industry litigation possible.

In this program, we engage Nesson's key arguments, focusing especially on Nesson's claim that copyright law's statutory damages regime runs afoul of constitutional protections against excessive and/or arbitrary civil damages awards.

Guests include Professor Nesson himself; Steven Marks, General Counsel for the Recording Industry Association of America; and three of the leading academic experts on punitive damages: New York University Professor Catherine Sharkey, Florida State Professor Dan Markel, and George Washington University Professor Thomas Colby. UCLA Law Professor Doug Lichtman moderates.

Lawyers can even get CLE credit in some states for listening.



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.