class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Overtime class actions: lawyers, too | Ephedra retailer litigation, cont'd »

October 27, 2004

The glass ceiling in the mirror

It is a dearly held assumption of many litigators on the plaintiff's side of employment discrimination law that large statistical gender imbalances among executive positions at places like Wal-Mart or Costco are strong evidence of wrongful discrimination. If that's so, one thing that's clear is that law firms, including plaintiff's firms, themselves are going to have a lot to answer for.

Posted by Walter Olson at 05:57 PM | TrackBack (1)

Employment Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.