class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs


« Liability in Canada: so near and yet so far | Canada, where all are equal but some are more equal than others »

July 28, 2004

Canadian Pain-and-Suffering Caps

Walter is exactly right -- Canadian pain and suffering awards are capped. They have been capped for over 20 years.

This is a product of two phenomena:

1. Canada has a unitary court system: all judges of significance are named by the federal government (even if they are in provincial courts), and all provincial court decisions may be appealed to the Canadian Supreme Court.

2. There are no juries, for all intents and purposes, in Canadian tort trials.

As a result of these two phenomena, judges, not juries, set tort damage awards. Appeals courts may revise these damage awards for uniformity. In the 1970's, Canada's Supreme Court peremptorily announced that it would no longer tolerate huge differences in non-economic damages awards (aka "pain and suffering") from one province to the next, and from one judge to the next. It announced that it would reduce all non-economic damage awards to $100,000 CDN (since adjusted for inflation, of course).

Our jury system, and our dual court system, make it impossible to replicate the Canadian experience.

Posted by Michael Krauss at 07:33 AM | TrackBack (1)

Comparative Law



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.