PointofLaw.com

spacer FORUM FEATURED DISCUSSIONS PoL COLUMNS LEGAL EXPERTS ARTICLES BOOKS LINKS MASTHEAD ADVANCED SEARCH

Categories
Insurance Law


April 17, 2008


Abraham, "The Liability Century"


Haven't seen this new volume by Virginia lawprof Ken Abraham yet, but it looks to be of much interest:

From its beginning late in the nineteenth century, the availability of liability insurance led to the creation of new forms of liability, heavily influenced expansion of the liabilities that already existed, and continually promoted increases in the amount of money that was awarded in tort suits. A "liability-and-insurance spiral" emerged, in which the availability of liability insurance encouraged the imposition of more liability, and, in turn, the imposition of liability encouraged the further spread of insurance.

Liability insurance was not merely a source of funding for ever-greater amounts of tort liability. ...The very idea behind insurance--that spreading losses among large numbers of policyholders is desirable--came to influence the ideology of tort law. To serve the aim of loss spreading, liability had to expand.

(Harvard U. Press description via Robinette)

Posted by Walter Olson at 2:17 PM | TrackBack (0)

April 14, 2008


Federal regulation of the insurance industry


Although expanded supervision of insurers by Washington, D.C. sounds like a step in a vaguely Naderite direction, don't assume that plaintiff's lawyers necessarily support it. Texas's Perlmutter & Schuelke explain why some don't.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:05 AM | TrackBack (0)

April 10, 2008


Roger Parloff on Dickie Scruggs


Must-read profile of the Fall of Scruggs in the latest Fortune.

Scruggs was someone who could render all of State Farm's actuarial calculations irrelevant, because he had the power and know-how to force it to rewrite its contracts retroactively. ...

While the bribery accusations have attracted most of the media attention, the story of Scruggs's siege upon the insurance industry is more jaw-dropping still. These were lawsuits in which the law itself played only a bit part. Victory was to be secured by aggregating pressure points, of which the most valuable were press attacks, threats of legislation harmful to the target or its industry, and the instigation of paralyzing state and federal investigations of the target.

Notwithstanding Scruggs's initial reliance on legal arguments that have been rejected by every federal appeals judge who has considered them, he still managed to squeeze out of State Farm $150 million for policyholders who, from a cold, contractual perspective, were probably entitled to only a fraction of that.

Posted by Ted Frank at 2:08 PM | TrackBack (0)

April 9, 2008


Recent opinion roundup


Posted by Ted Frank at 7:39 AM | TrackBack (0)

April 5, 2008


Judge Senter disqualifies Katrina lawyers, Rigsby sisters


A fairly spectacular rebuke to the lawyers formerly allied with Dickie Scruggs in the hurricane litigation, as well as to the now-disgraced Scruggs himself: the judge has disqualified both the lawyers and the Rigsby sisters from participating in Katrina claims in the Southern District of Mississippi because of the gross conflicts of interest created when the (former) Scruggs Katrina Group hired the sisters as consultants despite their status as fact witnesses. Tons of coverage from David Rossmiller, from NMC/Folo, and at YallPolitics here, here, and here. Plus: more from David Rossmiller.

Posted by Walter Olson at 5:52 PM | TrackBack (0)

March 31, 2008


When lawyers pay material witnesses


Things don't always work out happily, as David Rossmiller notes of Dickie Scruggs's Katrina informants, the Rigsby sisters.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:10 AM | TrackBack (0)

March 28, 2008


Acme Insurance Regulation, Inc.


Florida's approach strikes David Rossmiller as Looney Tunes:

I've likened Florida lawmakers and regulators to Wile E. Coyote -- they persistently pursue failed strategies. Every time that Acme rocket backpack blows up or runs them headlong into a cliff, they strap on another. They also are somewhat like a guy who is denied a promotion and then comes home and beats the stuffing out of his dog. Everything about the state's insurance mess is someone else's fault -- they never pause to consider whether the central-command regulatory regime they love might be making things worse, or be one of the actual causes of the problem. Instead, they sound like some of the black helicopter conspiracy theorists, looking for evil everywhere. And when you are emotionally invested in finding wrongdoing, you keep at it, no matter how many times that rocket explodes and singes your fur.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:16 AM | TrackBack (0)

March 27, 2008


"Are Insurance Companies Getting Hosed in the Wind vs. Water Controversy?"


Brendan Vaughan's student note in the Illinois Law Review explores some of the questionable rulings in the Katrina litigation, and cites this weblog twice.

Posted by Ted Frank at 2:35 PM | TrackBack (0)

March 6, 2008


Louisiana better governed than Florida


On insurance regulation, at least, suggests David Rossmiller.

P.S. That doesn't necessarily go to cover former state AGs, though.

Posted by Walter Olson at 12:40 AM | TrackBack (0)

March 3, 2008


Well, that sure worked out well


Spitzer's decapitation of AIG and Marsh.

Posted by Walter Olson at 4:22 PM | TrackBack (0)


MORE FORUM ENTRIES . . .

MORE ON Insurance Law

Books


Articles



Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.