Follow POL on Twitter Mike and my debate must come to an end at some point, and I think it only fair to give him the final word since I got to open the discussion on Monday. I want to thank Mike for an engaging conversation and the Manhattan Institute for hosting us. It has been a stimulating experience for me, and I hope one that may prove useful to the readers.
Thanks to the Manhattan Institute and Mike Seigel
July 31, 2009 4:29 PM
FEATURED DISCUSSION ARCHIVE:
Do caps on medical malpractice damages hurt consumers?, December 2011
Trial Lawyers Inc.: State Attorneys General, October 2011
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, April 2011
Kagan Supreme Court nomination, May-June 2010
Election roundtable, November-December 2006
Who's the boss, September 2006
Medical judgement, July 2006
Lawyer Licensing, May 2006
Contingent claims, April 2006
Selling short, February-March 2006
Condition critical?, November-December 2005
Surpeme Court nomination, July-September 2005
Elections and selections, January 2005
Malpractice prescriptions, October/November 2004
Election 2004, September 2004
Fee-ding frenzy, August 2004
Smoking guns, July 2004
