PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

Contingency fees: format, links down

August 17, 2004 10:52 AM

Our second Featured Discussion brings together two of the nation's leading experts on legal ethics, Lester Brickman and Richard Painter, to discuss potential ways to improve the legal system through reforming the way lawyers charge contingency fees. For a fuller introduction to their views, see my entry on the main forum page.

Also, in contrast to the usual weblog format, new entries in this Featured Discussion are posted at the bottom rather than the top of the page. So scroll down. Thanks!

Table of contents of the discussion: August 17 Brickman; August 18 Painter; August 19 Brickman; August 20 Painter; August 26 Brickman.

 

 

 

FEATURED DISCUSSION ARCHIVE:


Do caps on medical malpractice damages hurt consumers?, December 2011
Trial Lawyers Inc.: State Attorneys General, October 2011
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, April 2011
Kagan Supreme Court nomination, May-June 2010
Election roundtable, November-December 2006
Who's the boss, September 2006
Medical judgement, July 2006
Lawyer Licensing, May 2006
Contingent claims, April 2006
Selling short, February-March 2006
Condition critical?, November-December 2005
Surpeme Court nomination, July-September 2005
Elections and selections, January 2005
Malpractice prescriptions, October/November 2004
Election 2004, September 2004
Fee-ding frenzy, August 2004
Smoking guns, July 2004

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.