class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs

November 2006 Archives

Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial

Economists Helland and Tabarrok examine thousands of tort cases to examine the effectiveness of the tort system. Among their conclusions: tort awards and settlements can be affected by jury demographics, income levels, and by partisan judges in states with judicial elections; and while judges and juries are different, their actual decision-making can be remarkably similar. The authors also, controversially, find support for unregulated contingency fees, the subject of a Point of Law featured discussion between Tabarrok and the Manhattan Institute's Jim Copland here. In addition, Helland and Tabarrok propose solutions to critical flaws in the tort system, including better jury guidance, wider geographic jury pools, less "junk science" in the courtroom, and more reliance on contracts as solutions to traditional tort problems.
sort entries by:
author | date | title | category

Featured Book:
Download useful chapters of The Litigation Explosion. Available chapters discuss contingency fees, long-arm jurisdiction, choice-of-law rules, and loser pays systems.
The Litigation Explosion.

Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Katherine Lazarski
Manhattan Institute

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.