class actions, disabled rights, copyright, attorneys general, online speech, law schools, obesity, New York, mortgages, legal blogs, safety, CPSC, pharmaceuticals, patent trolls, ADA filing mills, international human rights, humor, hate speech, illegal drugs, immigration law, cellphones, international law, real estate, bar associations, Environmental Protection Agency, First Amendment, insurance fraud, slip and fall, smoking bans, emergency medicine, regulation and its reform, dramshop statutes, hotels, web accessibility, United Nations, Alien Tort Claims Act, lobbyists, pools, school discipline, Voting Rights Act, legal services programs



Bringing Coherence to Mens Rea Analysis for Securities-Related Offenses

The drafters of the Model Penal Code understood the importance of clear mens rea requirements in the criminal law and created a flexible yet clear framework for drafting and interpreting these requirements in criminal statutes. However, federal lawmakers have declined to adopt MPC standards, and this article argues that the result has been chaotic and unpredictable federal jurisprudence with respect to securities-related criminal offenses. Michael L. Seigel suggests how the mens rea requirements of federal securities law might be interpreted in light of the MPC framework and proposes that Congress act to clarify this area of federal law.

Michael L. Seigel, 2006 Wis. L. Rev. 1563



sort entries by:
author | date | title | category

Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.