<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>New York Times, meet New York Times</title>
<link>http://www.pointoflaw.com/archives/000985.php</link>
<description>From a report in Sunday's Times: "'There is a strong consensus among people who have really studied the issue that caps on damages would tend to keep costs down and make liability insurance more affordable for doctors,' Dr. Sage said...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>new orleans airfare</title>
<link>http://new-orleans-airfare.1pr.us</link>
<description>new orleans airfare</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Four law professors</title>
<link>http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/002112.html</link>
<description>...are out with a new study saying that medical malpractice payouts in Texas didn&apos;t increase sharply between 1990 and 2002, hence no &quot;crisis&quot;, hence no case for damage limitations, etc., etc. (study; Reuters; N.Y.Times op-ed)....</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Great red flags of fraud&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.overlawyered.com/archives/002075.html</link>
<description>Ted has the latest on the unfolding silicosis-diagnosis scandal over at Point of Law. (The quoted phrase is from federal judge Janis Graham Jack, reacting to revelations about doctors&apos; mass misdiagnosis of workers.) Also, umpteen...</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
