PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

The dishonesty of NALFA and Terry Jesse

| No Comments


The National Association of Legal Fee Analysis is Terry Jesse, and, as best I can tell, no one else. Between June and August 2012, NALFA sent me multiple emails inviting me to pay a sizable sum to become a member of their organization and get referrals from them:

You've Been Nominated To The Attorney Fee Practice Group

You've been nominated to the Attorney Fee Practice Group. The Attorney Fee Practice Group is a practice group of qualified attorney fee experts, fee dispute arbitrators, and legal bill auditors.

In another 2012 email, Terry Jesse offered to interview me for a blog post to promote my victory in Bluetooth.

I refused to pay them money to get their endorsement, and ever since then, they've been attacking in little-read blog posts. If you read this post, you'd think I lost my Citigroup Securities objection and that NALFA was vindicated, when in fact they

In another post, NALFA accused me of filing a "boilerplate objection." They plainly hadn't even read my objection, and quickly edited the post without acknowledging the edit when I asked them to support that claim.

Fortunately, shareholders will receive an extra $26.7 million that NALFA and Terry Jesse thought should go to attorneys who billed 16,000 hours for document review done by attorneys hired after the case settled and then hid that from the judge. NALFA's jaw-dropping North-Korean-style propaganda to the contrary exposes them for the trial-lawyer shills that they are. No credible journalist should be relying upon them—indeed, it seems their pay-us-or-else business model merits some journalistic investigation.

Better coverage of the Citigroup case since my original post: Toothman; Lyle Roberts; SBM Blog; Solomon.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.