PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Jewish or Asian and rejected by Berkeley undergrad?

| 2 Comments


Call your lawyer. A jaw-dropping essay in the New York Times by a Berkeley outside admissions reviewer documents the perversion of California Prop 209 to discriminate against Asians and Jews with superior admissions credentials. Earlier at POL.

Update: Charles Murray notices, too.

2 Comments

I don't understand why there haven't been many lawsuits. Perhaps someone can explain -- is it because there is no specific statute giving an applicant standing to sue for more than injunctive relief, so no money verdicts are possible? Are class actions against these universities disallowed for some reason?

Over three decades I've interviewed scores of engineers and new graduates. I sought people to work in my departments. High school grades, activities, SAT scores, etc. meant absolutely nothing to me. College GPA was only mildly interesting as was the college that granted their degrees. I hired engineers who showed that they would work hard, show some creative thinking, were receptive to training and constructive criticism, could work well within a team, had good problem solving skills. I also looked for what I call fire in the belly, the drive and intensity that propels employees in the workplace to yield relevant results. I tried to identify and reject flakes, divas and divos, any who might be high maintenance employees. In retrospect, this approach worked for me, my colleagues, and employers. There seems to be little correlation between college admissions criteria and my hiring criteria.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.