PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Criminal defense lawyer escapes prosecution by lying

| No Comments


"Attorney Lorna Brown admits she took materials out of an Alameda County jail without showing them to guards after a visit with her then-client Yusuf Bey IV." "Brown admitted she met a member of the Bey family on an Oakland street corner two days later and handed off the papers. Brown said that she "got a really bad feeling after the transaction," but didn't do anything about it." Turns out those materials were Bey's witness hit instructions; Bey was hoping to escape a conviction for the murder of Oakland Post editor Chauncey Bailey by committing a few more murders.

Brown could have faced prosecution for her role in the affair, but cut a deal with the prosecutor: she would retire as an attorney, and there would be no criminal charges. Unfortunately, the prosecutor didn't structure the agreement as a deferred-prosecution agreement with a tolling of the statute of limitations, and when the statute of limitations expired, Brown reneged, and the prosecutor had to rely upon a complaint to disciplinary authorities.

Disciplinary authorities are now looking at a multi-year suspension for Brown's actions (the California Supreme Court rejected a two-year suspension as too lenient), but, for the life of me, I don't understand why this isn't an automatic disbarment: even if, somehow, the conduct of the attorney in the Bey case isn't sufficient to result in disbarment, why is Brown allowed to escape disciplinary action for reneging on her original agreement with the prosecutor? [San Jose Mercury via ABAJ; Chauncey Bailey Project]

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.