Hans A. von Spakovsky of Heritage has released the white paper "The Unfair Attack on Arbitration: Harming Consumers by Eliminating a Proven Dispute Resolution System." It cites some of my work on the issue, including my recent Manhattan Institute white paper.
von Spakovsky defends arbitration
Related Entries:
- CFPB and Disparate Impact
- Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as State AG
- The Unconscionability of California's "Amendable" Arbitration Agreements
- Two podcasts
- Public Citizen's Unfair Attack on Arbitration
- Unaccountable CFPB Avoids Court Scrutiny
- King Richard
- American Express v. Italian Colors: Reversal (5-3)
- The Undirected CFPB
- The CFPB's Misleading Complaint Database
- New Featured Discussion - Class Actions and Arbitration: American Express v. Italian Colors
- American Express v. Italian Colors
- Senator Warren's Inconsistent Approach to Regulatory Accountability
- New Report - Class Actions, Arbitration, and Consumer Rights: Why Concepcion is a Pro-Consumer Decision
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |
Leave a comment
Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.
The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.