Rep. Paul Ryan says he will debate anyone who calls the Schumer-Rubio bill "amnesty." I accept his challenge, and will be happy to debate him at the time and place of his choosing (though I'm booked on June 27 and 28). Does Ryan realize the "path-to-citizenship" provisions he thinks preclude an appellation of "amnesty" are riddled with loopholes and opportunities for executive-branch waivers? If he thinks that the Obama Administration DHS is not going to turn this proposed law into de facto amnesty, he is getting rolled by Senator Schumer; if he's aware of it, he's selling out conservative principles for cynical reasons that are almost certainly political miscalculations.
I accept Paul Ryan's challenge
- The Boston bombers and our immigration sieve
- Of course the Boston bombing should affect the immigration debate
- Podcast with Ilya Shapiro: Arizona v. U.S.
- How will the Supreme Court rule in Arizona v. U.S.?
- Podcast with Ilya Shapiro: Arizona v. U.S. analysis and predictions
- Around the web, February 21
- At the AAJ convention: immigration, hydrofracking and the usual
- Around the web, September 9
- DOJ's immigration sieve
- Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting
- "Rules for Growth: Promoting Innovation and Growth Through Legal Reform"
- Around the web, December 28
- On the radio this morning
Center for Legal Policy at the