PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

CrowdFund Association Open Letter to House Committee

| No Comments


The CrowdFund Intermediary Regulatory Association has published an open letter to the House Committee on Financial Services, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, in preparation for that Committee's hearing tomorrow on the SEC's delay in adopting the crowdfunding regulations required by the JOBS Act.

CFIRA takes pains to distinguish the efforts undertaken by SEC staffers to examine the issuer and diligently meet with stakeholders from the delay caused by the Commission itself. The group writes:

"[I]t is important to understand the hard work and dedication that has been shown by the staff in creating draft rules for the Commission. The staff has been proactive in meeting with all members of the industry each time we have requested their presence, and has been extremely proactive in reaching out to us to discuss many aspects of the regulations surrounding the JOBS Act. In fact, we believe that the staff has had draft rules before the Commissioners since November 2012. As you seek information from the SEC during your hearing on April 17, 2013, we encourage you to place your frustration and concern with the party most able to respond, and that party is the Commission, rather than the staff."

Meanwhile, if you're interested in hearing more about the practical implications of crowdfunding, please join me at the Ritz Group's "Shark Attack" crowdfunding symposium this Thursday, April 18, 2013 at the City Club in Buckhead (Atlanta) where I'll be joined by Maurice Lopes (Crowdfund Professional Association) and Candace Klein (SoMoLend and Bad Girl Ventures) in an interactive webcast event on the topic hosted by Dara Albright (NowStreet).

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.