PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Still more Citigroup Securities coverage

| No Comments


The Wall Street Journal ($) runs an extensive story on the Citigroup Securities litigation fee request and its $465/hour average charges for contract attorneys (multiplied to $900+/hour cost to shareholders). (One can avoid the paywall with a google search.) One highlight is this Perry-Mason-moment exchange in the fairness hearing where the district court asked Citigroup's attorneys what they charged for contract attorneys:

"I believe the cost was $25 to $35 an hour," Mr. Karp told Judge Stein at the hearing. "But Citigroup is a large vendor and has enormous market power."

Of course, class counsel in a securities litigation of this size also has enormous market power when it offer to buy over 61,000 hours of contract-attorney time—or even over 45,000 hours of contract-attorney time if one excludes the 16,000+ hours billed to contract attorneys after the case settled, a second example of bill inflation that proves the bad faith of the first example.

Professor Stephen Gillers makes the best case for any markup of contract attorneys: "A law firm might charge a client more because the firm is professionally liable for the contract lawyer's work, or because it provided the temps with office space or computers, said Stephen Gillers, a law professor and legal-ethics expert at New York University School of Law. 'All of that justifies a markup,' he said. 'The question is how much.'"

Except in this case, the Second Circuit forbids class members from suing class counsel for malpractice in a settlement eventually adjudicated fair and reasonable, so class counsel faces no real risk of malpractice; and the office space and computers were provided by the third-party vendor. In such a case, the ABA ethics opinion requires the expense to billed out without a markup.

More: Reuters; Law360 ($).

More Point of Law coverage.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.