PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Comcast v. Behrend

| No Comments


A bitterly divided Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to reverse the Third Circuit and decertify a class in Comcast v. Behrend (SCOTUSblog; How Appealing news roundup) yesterday. Trask has a good summary. Skadden reports that the

decision is welcome news for defendants given the recent weakening of class action standards by some federal courts. By clarifying that a trial court must apply a "rigorous analysis" to each of the Rule 23 prerequisites, including predominance -- even where such analysis entails an overlap with the merits underlying the plaintiff's claims -- the Court has indicated that lax class certification standards have no place in federal class action practice. In addition, those lower courts that have resisted the Supreme Court's recent class certification decisions may be more inclined to deny class certification in cases involving individualized damages determinations.

See also WLF. But plaintiffs' lawyers are telling Reuters that decision won't make much difference and can be readily evaded in future cases. We'll know more what the Supreme Court thinks about the scope of Comcast when they take action on the pending Whirlpool v. Glazer cert petition.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.