Though extensive due process protections apply to the investigation of crimes, and to criminal trials, perhaps the most important part of the criminal process -- the decision whether to charge a defendant, and with what -- is almost entirely discretionary. Given the plethora of criminal laws and regulations in today's society, this due process gap allows prosecutors to charge almost anyone they take a deep interest in. This Essay discusses the problem in the context of recent prosecutorial controversies involving the cases of Aaron Swartz and David Gregory, and offers some suggested remedies, along with a call for further discussion.
"Ham Sandwich Nation: Due Process When Everything is a Crime"
- Committing bribery without knowing it
- New Report: The world's policeman in FCPA enforcement
- Aaron Swartz and overcriminalization
- Why does FDA keep drugmakers from informing doctors?
- Overcriminalization and CEO pay
- More on Caronia
- The Transatlantic War Against Homework
- Abuse of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
- Overcriminalization sale on Amazon
- Overcriminalization videos
- Partners in Crime: Overcriminalization and Overfederalization
- Gibson Guitars settles
- Single Oxycontin pill = ruined life
- Is This What We Shipped For? US Government's Pursuit of Marine Biologist Nancy Black Continues
Center for Legal Policy at the