Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



Government-Sanctioned Credit Ratings

| No Comments

A recent enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) signals that troubles caused by over-reliance on government-sanctioned credit rating agencies, a problem that played a role in the last financial crisis, are not over. For decades, the SEC officially recognized a small group of credit rating agencies and government agencies fostered market participants' reliance on their ratings by incorporating them into their rules. As a result, the three largest credit rating agencies, which enjoyed the SEC's blessing, became very entrenched.

A 2006 law attempted to open the door to more competition by formalizing the process for obtaining the government stamp of approval. Dodd-Frank subsequently required government agencies to get rid of regulatory references to credit ratings, an important change that is not yet fully implemented. Yet both laws also deepened the SEC's oversight of credit rating agencies and thus the perception that credit ratings have a government sanction.

Last week's enforcement action involved one of the smaller credit rating agencies that had secured a government license to issue ratings under the 2006 law. The SEC alleged that the credit rating agency had exaggerated its experience in rating issuers of asset-backed and government securities when it applied to be an SEC-registered rater of those classes of credit ratings. The SEC prohibited the credit rating agency from issuing ratings of that type for eighteen months absent prominent disclosure that the ratings are not from a government-approved source.

Stepping back from the merits of this particular enforcement action, if we are trying to encourage investors to do their own homework before relying on ratings, the current regulatory approach does not seem ideal. It is not consistent with the Dodd-Frank mandate that references to credit ratings be removed from regulations. By highlighting the government's approval or disapproval of particular credit rating agencies, the regulatory framework encourages the same type of unquestioning reliance on ratings by government-approved rating agencies that helped to get us into the crisis.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Katherine Lazarski
Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.