PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

This Week's Dodd-Frank Implementation Hearings

| No Comments


The House Financial Services Committee will hold two hearings this week on Dodd-Frank implementation--the first on derivatives and the second on the Volcker Rule, which limits banks proprietary trading and private fund activities. Both portions of Dodd-Frank have proved more difficult to implement than their Pollyannish proponents envisioned. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission came out of the gate quickly with its derivatives rules, but market realities have forced it to moderate the pace of the implementation process through a series of staff guidance documents. The Volcker Rule regulators have issued a proposal, but apparent inter-regulator struggles have delayed a final rule.

Wednesday's derivatives hearing is likely to focus on technical implementation issues, but Thursday's Volcker hearing offers an opportunity to raise more fundamental questions. Is the Volcker Rule the right way to address the government's decision to stand behind so many of the banking system's liabilities? Are regulators capable of preventing bankers from engaging in the risky behavior that deposit insurance encourages them to pursue, or is the market better able to police and punish bankers that take on excessive risk? Will the Volcker Rule simply reinforce dangerous tendencies for markets to lean on regulators to make risk determinations and taxpayers to bear the associated losses?

Such inquiries at the Volcker hearing would encourage a productive dialogue on how the market can be harnessed to carry out the discipline that regulators struggle so hard to exercise. There are feasible options that would cause shareholders and creditors--rather than regulators--of financial institutions to pay more attention to risks those entities are taking on. Placing reasonable limits on deposit insurance, exposing shareholders of financial institutions to losses (beyond having their equity wiped out) if their entities fail, increasing transparency of banks' portfolios, making banks' supervisory ratings public, and introducing contingent capital to force creditors to monitor banks are several options that should be considered. Financial institutions, scared of alienating potential creditors and shareholders, would respond to these measures by being more careful--the result the Volcker Rule is trying to achieve.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.