The majority of states that have enacted bans on texting while driving have seen accident rates go up, rather than down. One theory is that, while texting while driving has gone down, this is more than offset by the increased number of people who try to surreptitiously text while drive by holding a smartphone below the steering wheel—a much more dangerous proposition. [MR]
Nanny-state unintended consequences department?
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.
The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.
Related Entries:
- Durbin Amendment punishes DC parkers
- CPSC attempting to ban "Buckyballs"
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Adverse effects of CARD Act's limits on freedom of contract
- San Francisco anti-Happy-Meal law doesn't work the way they wanted it to
- November 23 roundup
- Around the web, October 14
- Around the web, September 27
- Around the web, September 20
- Around the web, August 19
- Poorly-drafted Medicare legislation adding costs
- As good an argument for tax simplification as any
- Around the web, August 11
- Around the web, June 27
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |




There is a simple fact in play here. Distracted drivers are dangerous and similar to intoxicated ones. I can't necessarily prove it by citing scholarly studies or learned treatises. But every time some one ahead of me is dawdling, driving too slow, swerving over the lane lines, sitting at a green light, taking too long to make a right turn or otherwise being a general pain, they are invariably yakking on a cell phone or texting. Or both. Take it from me and my anecdotal experience. You heard it here first.
Whether the law in question is effective or counterproductive is another matter. I thought "inattentive driving" was against the law in most, if not all states.