- Great J Russell Jackson piece on class action settlements—and 4 of the 9 cited cases are cases I won. [NLJ/law.com]
- "Comcast v. Behrend: class actions at the Supreme Court" [OL and links therein; SCOTUSblog page]
- Updated Ninth Circuit decision in Dennis v. Kellogg supersedes previous decision, comes to same good result on the question of consumers versus class action lawyers. [earlier on POL]
- NFL motion to dismiss concussion litigation. [Heitner @ Forbes]
- More on California Prop 37. [WLF; earlier at Point of Law]
- Thank goodness for that injunctive relief! [Nutella; earlier at Point of Law]
- Epstein on Hayek and Ryan.
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz attacks Examiner for 'deliberately' misquoting her, but here's the audio. [Klein]
- The hypocritical Obama stoner ad. [@SanhoTree link roundup]
- Tweet of the day: "I hear the DNC had a video tribute to Ted Kennedy, the only politician with a confirmed kill in the War on Women." [@IMAO]
Around the web, September 5
Related Entries:
- A Lilly Ledbetter reminder
- Hecht v. United Collection Bureau (2d Circuit)
- Cert grant in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles
- Lemus v. H&R Block
- Bluetooth ripples: Fraley v. Facebook
- Food lawsuits
- In re Online DVD Rental Antitrust Litigation
- Update: Apple iPhone 4 bumper class action settlement
- Parloff on cy pres
- Groupon class action settlement: when is $8.5 million not $8.5 million?
- Damned if you do files: Chase Bank credit card class action
- More on vice-presidential vetting
- Lawyers and law firms contribute heavily to the presidential campaign
- Speaking of vetting
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |




Leave a comment
Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.
The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.