A federal judge in Oklahoma held that the trial failed to demonstrate that the Louisville Slugger in question was any more dangerous than any other baseball bat, and the jury verdict could not stand. The fact that Oklahoma caps noneconomic damages surely made a difference here: without the threat of jackpot justice, the defendant could defend itself without fear of disproportionate liability. In contrast, a New Jersey case against the same defendant resulted in a multi-million-dollar settlement divorced from any showing of culpability. [Fisher via @overlawyered]
$1M baseball bat verdict overturned in Oklahoma
- Aaron Hernandez and obstruction of justice?
- Breaking: Fifth Circuit upholds Mississippi damages caps
- Epstein on providing for the poor
- "Supreme Court case involves medical malpractice awards, Medicaid"
- Does Fisher matter?
- Deep pockets files: Greensboro apartment complex murder
- HRT punitive damages before Pennsylvania Supreme Court
- $14.5M New Jersey settlement over metal baseball bats
- Summers v. Tice revisited
- $48 million jackpot justice asbestos award for 86-year-old
- Around the web, June 23
- NYC lawsuit payouts: $560M in 2011
- The problems of product liability
- Federal constitutional challenge to Texas tort reform rejected