PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Plaintiffs' attorneys against voter ID

| 1 Comment


The trial lawyers are jumping fully into the voter-identification conflict, with the American Association for Justice creating a Voter Protection Action Committee and offering training to its members.

AAJ recently added three training sessions to the agenda of its annual convention, which starts this weekend in Chicago. From the webpage promoting the training via hyperbole:

A coordinated effort to suppress the vote and skew the outcome of the 2012 elections is under way. More than 5 million voters could be affected--more votes than decided the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. No surprise, the legislation heavily targets young, poor, and African American voters--who disproportionately support Democrats. Come hear about the effects these new laws could have on voters and how you can help!

Also, Dallas trial lawyer Lisa Baron Blue highlighted her opposition to voter ID laws in her statement of candidacy for AAJ vice president (a position that traditionally leads to becoming president of the organization):

Providing monetary support and organizing fund raising activities is not enough to assure that the justice system is protected. Over the last 2 years, states have passed discriminatory measures which will impede voting rights. I will be working with leadership such as Julie Kane to help mobilize lawyers to protect the vote. Last election, AAJ helped mobilize lawyers throughout the country to work at the polls and provide legal assistance to those exercising their voting rights. This year, we must be more strategic and involve many more of our lawyers since the problem has grown exponentially.

For all the claims about activism, however, there's scarcely a mention of the issue on the AAJ's website or its blog, FightingforJustice, although the blog certainly has it in for ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council). ALEC gets attacked for writing model voter identification laws, which actually happen to be popular with voters. (h/t Jennifer Rubin) And we've never spotted "voting rights" or something similar in the AAJ's lobbying reports.

So, why are plaintiff's attorneys and products liability lawyers busying themselves with attacking voter ID laws? Or, as a keen legal observer asked recently, "So there's a tort there?"

It's possible that AAJ members are motivated by true ideology and honestly believe legitimate voters will be denied their opportunity to cast a ballot. It's ... possible. AAJ does have a Civil Rights Section.

We tend to think it's political constituency service, along with self-service. The trial lawyers want to help losing Democratic candidates who might challenge their defeats as the result of voter suppression.

Still, there's another possibility. From the agenda for a meeting at the convention of the Civil Rights Section, a 15-minute presentation by Robert Sykes, a Utah attorney who otherwise specializes in personal injury suits:

"How to Make Money in Civil Rights Cases."

Update (6:45 a.m. Friday): The Heritage Foundation issued a paper on July 25, "Lessons from the Voter ID Experience in Kansas," which argues, "The latest data compiled by the Secretary of State of Kansas, Kris Kobach, about the state's experience with voter ID once again shows that the claims by opponents of voter identification are wrong."

On Thursday, the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution held an oversight hearing on the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division's approach to enforcing voting rights laws. Video via C-Span. More here.

Finally, a knowledgeable observer of the trial lawyers notes that the AAJ has relatively few black members, suggesting that the "voter protection" effort is really a membership marketing initiative and effort to prove the group's value to interested members of Congress.

1 Comment

"A coordinated effort to suppress the vote and skew the outcome of the 2012 elections is under way." What utter nonsense! It is to prevent rampant voter fraud by Democrats that the laws are being put in place. Every dead person is a possible Democrat vote.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.