PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

Manhattan Institute releases its Season-End Report for the 2012 Proxy Season

| No Comments


Jarrett Dieterle
Legal Intern, Manhattan Institute's Center for Legal Policy

As part of its Proxy Monitor project, the Manhattan Institute's Center for Legal Policy has released its 2012 Proxy Season: Season-End Report. The report, authored by CLP Director James Copland, spotlights union-backed shareholder proposals in the 2012 proxy season. Copland notes that labor union pension fund proposals increased in 2012, and that unions are among the most frequent proponents of proposals that would require companies to disclose their political spending. Furthermore, Copland analyzes the extent to which unions might be using the proxy process to pursue goals unrelated to increasing shareholder value:

Labor investors were also more likely than others to sponsor proposals related to political spending; such proposals are less likely designed to gain leverage over management in union negotiations but may be designed to squelch corporate political spending and lobbying that would generally be adverse to the interests of organized labor.


As in previous years, labor unions' shareholder proposals in 2012 have been unequally distributed across sectors. Companies in financial services and retail -- lightly unionized sectors that are significant public targets of union-organizing campaigns -- remain significantly more likely to be targeted by labor-backed proposals. Among companies receiving multiple proposals in these sectors this year that are also the publicly announced union targets are Bank of America, Citigroup, Rite Aid, Safeway, Wal-Mart, and Wells Fargo.

Copland has focused on labor union proxy activities in previous Proxy Monitor reports as well. Manhattan Institute's Proxy Monitor site also contains a database of shareholder proposals at Fortune 200 companies from 2006-2012.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.