Last week, George Will wrote about Marine biologist Nancy Black, who has been under criminal investigation for years in connection with a 2005 incident in which a crew member on her whale-watching ship whistled at a humpback whale. (Yes, you read that right.) The Wall Street Journal previously reported that Ms. Black was not charged with interfering with the whale, but with making a false statement to government investigators when she edited a videotape of the incident in order to highlight the whistling. Ms. Black is also under investigation for illegally "feeding" killer whales, when she cut a hole in a strip of blubber (which the orcas had torn off a gray whale they had killed, and on which they were already feeding) in order to photograph the whales. Ms. Black's home has been raided, her files and computers seized, her accountant subpoenaed, and her life savings depleted. George Will likens the situation to Kafka, but when examining whether this is how the criminal law should work, we might ask ourselves, as the Pequod's crew did, is this what we shipped for?
Is This What We Shipped For? US Government's Pursuit of Marine Biologist Nancy Black Continues
- Overcriminalization, the comic
- Gibson Guitar CEO on overcriminalizing businesses
- Greg Conko: GSK to pay $3 billion; FDA's "debarment trap" strikes again
- Manhattan Institute Event: Overcriminalizing the Empire State?
- James Copland on overcriminalization: NY prosecutors have too much power
- A 12 Step Program For Overcriminalization
- Hans Bader on double jeopardy safeguards: Blueford v. Arkansas
- New Podcast: John Edwards prosecution
- James Copland: Justice Department may be in the next cubicle
- The John Edwards trial: "Cad Example"
- Arbitrary campaign finance prosecution department
- Around the web, May 11
- Around the web, May 10
- Paul Larkin responds to FOCUS Act critiques
Center for Legal Policy at the