PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

In re EasySaver Rewards Litigation class action settlement

| 1 Comment


In In re EasySaver Rewards Litig., No. 09-cv-2094 (S.D. Cal.), the attorneys (including Point of Law favorites Baron & Budd) and the class representatives have proposed a settlement agreement where they will collect $8.93 million, while the class will get less than $3 million in cash. The attorneys justify this because they're giving out about $40 million face value in coupons. Instead of complying with the Class Action Fairness Act's requirement that coupons be valued at redemption value, the trial lawyers claim that they're "conservatively discount[ing]" the coupons to 85% of their face value—though limited-use coupons like these more typically have a redemption rate of about 1 to 3%. (Who is going to use a $20 coupon for Internet flower delivery that can't be used on Valentine's Day or combined with any other coupon?) Defendants are barred by the settlement from taking a position on the value of the coupons. Even if one assumes a generous 10% redemption rate, the attorneys come out ahead of their putative clients. To top it all off, the settlement violates Nachshin v. AOL's restrictions on cy pres awards: local charities get the money, including an alma mater of one of the lead attorneys.

Today is the preliminary hearing on the question whether the Southern District of California judge will permit the settlement to go forward. One hopes that the judge unilaterally recognizes his duty to protect class members from violations of the Class Action Fairness Act, since the parties' briefing doesn't mention the applicable law.

And if the class does get notice, one hopes that a class member recognizes the ripoff and considers contacting a non-profit attorney willing to vindicate the class's interests. First the class is ripped off with $15/month loyalty programs, and then their own attorneys aggregate the majority of the value of the settlement for themselves.

The proposed class definition is "All persons who, between August 19, 2005 and the date of entry of the Preliminary Approval order, placed an order with a website operated by Provide Commerce, Inc. and were subsequently enrolled by Regent Group Inc. dba Encore Marketing International, Inc. in one or more of the following membership programs: EasySaver Rewards, RedEnvelope Rewards, or Preferred Buyers Pass." There are apparently about two million class members.

1 Comment

they are a rip off

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.