PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

U.K. Parliament expected to adopt binding 'say on pay' votes

| No Comments


Jarrett Dieterle
Legal Intern, Manhattan Institute's Center for Legal Policy

Earlier this week, we discussed the possibility of binding "say on pay" votes being enacted in the U.K. In particular, we highlighted a BIS report that proposed several policies which would empower shareholders with regard to executive compensation. Although binding "say on pay" votes had been discussed, no official legislation was being considered by the British Parliament.

That is, until now. On Wednesday, U.K. Business Secretary Vince Cable introduced a plan to Parliament that would give shareholders binding votes on executive compensation, as well as requiring companies to annually publish a "simple figure" disclosing how much top executives were paid in the past year.

Shareholders would have an annual binding vote on executive-director pay unless a company leaves its policy unchanged, in which case the vote will take place every three years. Investors also will vote on exit payments.

The plan still has to go through Parliament, although it is widely expected to pass. The push for binding say on pay votes gained renewed traction in Britain this spring after several high-profile disputes between shareholders and executives at large companies.

Executive pay has become a major issue in recent months in the U.K., with shareholders increasingly unwilling to allow bosses to receive high salaries when their companies underperform. The debate also has reverberated in the U.S., where some companies have failed to get majority support for their executive-pay plans this year.

In 2010, Dodd-Frank mandated say on pay votes in the U.S., but they remain advisory rather than binding - at least for now.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.