PointofLaw.com
 Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  
   
 
   

 

 

The underreported cost of proxy battles

| No Comments


Jarrett Dieterle
Legal Intern, Manhattan Institute's Center for Legal Policy

Even when a company wins a proxy battle against activist shareholders, it often still endures significant losses. The American Banker reported Tuesday that costs associated with proxy battles are on the rise. Proxy fights can cost companies well over $100,000, with SEC filing fees alone costing up to $25,000. Comparatively, activist investors often spend anywhere from $100,000 to upwards of a million dollars in their efforts to successfully wage a proxy battle against a company.

Two of the three banks involved in recent proxy battles have disclosed some of their costs. Harvard Illinois Bancorp said it paid $100,000 in the first quarter alone to successfully fight off Stilwell Group. And Cardinal Bankshares reported that its legal fees doubled in the first quarter from a year earlier, to nearly $100,000 ... These expenses are expected to increase in the second quarter as the banking companies stepped up efforts leading to their annual meetings.

Furthermore, it should be noted, monetary costs are not the only harm companies suffer from contentious proxy battles.

There are other intangible costs that can be far more damaging to a bank. Observers say a dug-in battle creates more uncertainty, making it hard for a bank to plan and implement a growth strategy. 'The main costs is not the dollars and cents; it's the time, the distraction, the tension and all the mental fatigue factor that's the cost,' Weismann [a partner at Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick] says.

Thus, on account of the substantial monetary and opportunity costs involved, even companies that successfully defend themselves against activist proxy efforts can potentially suffer significant losses in the end.

Leave a comment

Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.

The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.

Related Entries:

 

 


Isaac Gorodetski
Project Manager,
Center for Legal Policy at the
Manhattan Institute
igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org

Katherine Lazarski
Press Officer,
Manhattan Institute
klazarski@manhattan-institute.org

 

Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.