- Coverage of Dewey: Fisher; Reuters; Advice Goddess.
- Coverage of the Brazil v. Dell shenanigans in the Ninth Circuit: Reuters; Reuters.
In the news, June 1
Related Entries:
- Robert F. Booth Trust v. Crowley oral argument
- Cobell v. Salazar (D.C. Cir. 2012)
- Ninth Circuit Limits Reach of Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
- Around the web, May 7
- Evading CAFA's scrutiny of coupons: In re Online DVD Rental
- Cy pres in the appellate courts: In re Lupron and In re Baby Products
- Settlements in Kansas "hot fuel" litigation MDL
- $7M for attorneys, $0.5M for class
- Dewey v. Volkswagen oral argument tomorrow
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- Bad typography evidence of bad faith?
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
- Apple class actions
- Ninth Circuit finds Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |




Leave a comment
Once submitted, the comment will first be reviewed by our editors and is not guaranteed to be published. Point of Law editors reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments. They also have the right to block access to any one or group from commenting or from the entire blog. A comment which does not add to the conversation, runs of on an inappropriate tangent, or kills the conversation may be edited, moved, or deleted.
The views and opinions of those providing comments are those of the author of the comment alone, and even if allowed onto the site do not reflect the opinions of Point of Law bloggers or the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research or any employee thereof. Comments submitted to Point of Law are the sole responsibility of their authors, and the author will take full responsibility for the comment, including any asserted liability for defamation or any other cause of action, and neither the Manhattan Institute nor its insurance carriers will assume responsibility for the comment merely because the Institute has provided the forum for its posting.