The Sixth Circuit has affirmed the convictions of Shirley Cunningham, Jr. and William Gallion, whose rip-off of clients in a mass tort settlement has been the subject of coverage in this blog for years. The opinion's summary of the facts facially demonstrate the ethical violations of everyone involved, and don't even include some of the more appalling conduct, such as the diversion of supposed cy pres to a Florida A&M Chair that paid one of the attorneys. The Sixth Circuit upheld a refusal to admit expert testimony that would have endorsed the propriety of the cy pres.
Breaking: federal Kentucky fen-phen convictions upheld
Related Entries:
- Evading CAFA's scrutiny of coupons: In re Online DVD Rental
- Around the web, May 1
- Gallucci v. Boiron
- Cy pres in the appellate courts: In re Lupron and In re Baby Products
- Hans Bader: Ambulance chasers feast on Americans with Disabilities Act claims
- $7M for attorneys, $0.5M for class
- New Featured Discussion:"Class actions: rife with abuse or an important legal safeguard?"
- "Attorney fee-only" bankruptcy plans
- Apple iPhone 4 bumper class action settlement
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- Around the web, March 13
- Day v. Persels & Associates
- Reflection on the criminal law scholarship of William Stuntz
- Suffolk County DA slush fund?
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |




Leave a comment