In a successful federal class action against AT&T, the class was about six million members, but only 6,961 people filed claims on the $10.2 million fund after $500,000 in advertising. The lawyers have already been paid $6.2 million, or nearly 38% of the common fund. At least the settlement was structured so that it's the claimants who get most of the windfall rather than unrelated third-party charities. But heaven forfend they use actual AT&T customer lists. The attorneys say that doing so would have cost $2 million (an implausible claim), but even that would have resulted in more money in the class's pockets. And the attorneys didn't have any compunction in asking for an extra $2 million for themselves above the 25% benchmark at the class's expense. [SF Chronicle via @Russell_Jackson]
0.1% claim rate in "successful" class action
Related Entries:
- Evading CAFA's scrutiny of coupons: In re Online DVD Rental
- Breaking: federal Kentucky fen-phen convictions upheld
- Fox Business on class action settlements
- Gallucci v. Boiron
- Cy pres in the appellate courts: In re Lupron and In re Baby Products
- Hans Bader: Ambulance chasers feast on Americans with Disabilities Act claims
- $7M for attorneys, $0.5M for class
- New Featured Discussion:"Class actions: rife with abuse or an important legal safeguard?"
- Around the web, April 11
- What does the Baylor Law data leak tell us about affirmative action?
- "Attorney fee-only" bankruptcy plans
- Apple iPhone 4 bumper class action settlement
- Around the web, March 13
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Day v. Persels & Associates
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



