An 8-1 decision correctly enforces the default freedom of contract to arbitrate in a credit-card agreement in the absence of statutory language eliminating it, but look forward to litigation lobby supporters calling it an example of pro-business bias (notwithstanding the overwhelming bipartisan support for the decision) rather than an example of the Supreme Court correcting the Ninth Circuit's anti-business bias.
Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Evading CAFA's scrutiny of coupons: In re Online DVD Rental
- Speaking of upside-down premption: Arizona v. United States
- Podcast with Ilya Shapiro: Arizona v. U.S. analysis and predictions
- $7M for attorneys, $0.5M for class
- New Podcasts: The constitutionality of Obamacare
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Kiobel debate complete
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Update on California foreign policy efforts
Center for Legal Policy at the