Even if PPACA survives Supreme Court scrutiny, the poorly-drafted statute will require a legislative fix or be unworkable, according to an analysis in the WSJ by Jonathan Adler and Michael Cannon. More detail: Forbes, Adler @ Volokh.
- The implications
- It's the Spending Clause, stupid!
- Live Stream Event: What the ObamaCare decision means
- Two senses of federalism
- Winning the battle, but losing the war (for expansive federal government power)?
- Roberts can be criticized, but he's no Souter
- PPACA still in trouble even if administration wins in SCOTUS
- The ABA Journal's historical revisionism
- The ACA, Intrade, and other tea leaves
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- New MI report: Epstein and Hyman on PPACA
- Dahlia Lithwick does it again
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- Regulators at cross-purposes
- HR 5