Follow POL on Twitter Robert Ambrogi writes of two recent cases where experts retained by or on behalf of Stan Chesley essentially disavowed their testimony after being confronted with unpleasant facts that had been kept from them in drafting their testimony. My Point of Law post on the subject is quoted.
Chesley experts in two cases drop testimony
Related Entries:
- How much is the Bluetooth settlement injunction worth?
- Around the web, February 21
- New podcasts from the Manhattan Institute
- Event video featuring Kenneth R. Feinberg: Is America's legal system broken?
- Preempro jackpot justice verdicts in Philadelphia
- Kentucky fen-phen scandal update
- Liability for thee, but not for me
- Texas Supreme Court finishes off Garza v. Merck
- "Win or lose, trial lawyers get millions in Vioxx fees"
- Dewey v. Volkswagen opening brief
- What the heck is going on in King County family court?
- Around the web, July 12
- Around the web, June 24
- Podcast on Wal-Mart v. Dukes
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |
