New York state law has no provision for awarding attorney fees to objectors who improve class action settlements; while most courts recognize the "common fund" aspect of awarding fees, New York courts do not. The absence of statutory authority has meant that class members, who already have little incentive to challenge unfair settlements, do not even have the hope of winning fees. A law has since passed the legislature to fix this loophole; this may be the first explicit statutory authority for class-action objectors to recover fees. [Reuters]
"Cuomo considering law change on class-action attorneys' fees"
Related Entries:
- Judge Sanctions Porn Troll
- Two podcasts
- "A Facebook Deal That Needs Unfriending"
- FACTA shakedown files: Albright v. Bi-State Dev. Agency
- Dry Max Pampers Litigation update
- CAFA violation in Korean Air Passenger settlement
- The cy pres morass and In re BankAmerica Corp. Securities Litigation
- Dennis v. Kellogg on remand
- Silverman v. Motorola
- Marek v. Lane & Dry Max Pampers in today's NY Times
- $3M more for Wyeth shareholders after CCAF objection
- Speaking at 2013 ABA Class Action National Institute
- Richardson v. L'Oreal class action settlement
- The dishonesty of NALFA and Terry Jesse
- CCAF Sixth Circuit victory in Pampers Dry Max
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |