Poorly-drafted 2007 legislation intended to help Medicare collect money it's owed when secondary payers (such as personal injury defendants) reimburse Medicare recipients for medical expenses already paid by Medicare is having adverse consequences. Because insurers are strictly liable for $1000/day fines if they accidentally shortchange Medicare a penny, they are essentially forced to get Medicare confirmation before signing off on settlement payments. But there is no time limit for Medicare to respond, and no statute of limitations for Medicare to decide whether to collect; regulatory compliance costs are effectively a hidden tax on all parties involved. Both trial lawyers and the Chamber of Commerce are lobbying for a fix. [NLJ; HR 1063]
Poorly-drafted Medicare legislation adding costs
Related Entries:
- Zywicki on Skeel on Dodd-Frank
- Nanny-state unintended consequences department?
- Durbin Amendment punishes DC parkers
- Pane and Suffering at Apple Store on Long Island
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Adverse effects of CARD Act's limits on freedom of contract
- San Francisco anti-Happy-Meal law doesn't work the way they wanted it to
- Around the web, October 14
- Around the web, September 27
- Update: good result in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions
- Around the web, August 19
- Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions
- As good an argument for tax simplification as any
- Douglas v. Independent Living Center of Southern California
![]() |
Rafael Mangual Project Manager, Legal Policy rmangual@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
Communications Manhattan Institute communications@manhattan-institute.org |