Harvey Silverglate celebrates a Florida federal district-court ruling invalidating a state drug law as unconstitutional for lack of a mens rea requirement, but I'm less optimistic than he is that it will have long-term meaning: this is just a single trial judge and, while the U.S. Supreme Court has been skeptical of legislative overcriminalization, they haven't given any sign that they would be anywhere nearly as aggressive as this decision was. But I'll be happy if Silverglate is right.
Is mens rea constitutionally required? Shelton v. Department of Corrections
- Bond v. U.S.
- A Poster Child for Overcriminalization: The History of the Lacey Act
- Opposing FCPA Overcriminalization
- The Detrimental Effects of Extreme Deterrence
- The Bond That Ties: A Case-Study in Federalism
- Debate Concludes: The need for a reasonable mistake of law defense
- Reply: Never underestimate a defense lawyer's imagination
- A Debate: The need for a reasonable mistake of law defense
- Follow the debate: Overcriminalization is a problem, but a 'mistake of law defense' is not the right solution
- New Featured Discussion: Reconsidering the 'mistake of law defense' in the battle against overcriminalization
- Teen Sexting, Youthful Mistake or Felony?
- New Podcast: Federal overcriminalization hurts Ohioans
- Illinois, Chicago treats small businesses like they're a problem
- A better solution to prison overcrowding
- Whose Intent is it Anyway? The Case for State Flexibility in Criminal Law
Center for Legal Policy at the