The New Haven fire department, by virtue of its loss in Ricci, is now subject to a disparate-impact claim from minority firefighters who did not benefit from the recognition of test results after the Supreme Court's resolution of the disparate treatment claim. As the Second Circuit notes, this is largely a consequence of the litigation choices of the city in conjunction with existing incoherent disparate-impact law. But the effect is that just about any civil-service promotion method is the subject of a prima facie claim of illegality.
Damned if you do files: Briscoe v. New Haven
- CFPB and Disparate Impact
- No, Virginia, the employment class action is not dead
- CEI, Cato, and PLF weigh in on Mount Holly
- The Supreme Court on Title VII
- Equal Pay Act redux
- New blog: Executive Branch Review
- Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.
- "Worst FDNY class in the department's history"
- How the trial-lawyer tax is hurting hiring
- Blessing v. Sirius XM en banc petitions
- Second Circuit "punts" in Blessing v. Sirius
- Where are the lawsuits on behalf of Asian-Americans?
- Hans Bader on disparate impact liability
- Does Fisher matter?
- United States v. Caronia
Center for Legal Policy at the