Follow POL on Twitter I'd love to talk about class actions, the First Amendment implications of frivolous libel suits without anti-SLAPP protection, the myth of a pro-business Supreme Court, or even "Hot Coffee", but they just want to talk to me about Caylee's Law. Here's the Delaware version of the story, quoting me. And I'll be on News Radio 680 WPTF (North Carolina) at 10:06 AM to discuss the subject.
Yes, they're still talking about Caylee's Law
Related Entries:
- Overcriminalization on the high seas
- Around the web, April 11
- New statute would make state witness tampering a federal crime
- Bader on the Theodore Urban case
- Paul Larkin on the STOCK Act
- Reflection on the criminal law scholarship of William Stuntz
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Around the web, February 21
- Distinguishing between the "public corruption amendment" and fighting public corruption
- Bill introduced to de-criminalize the Lacey Act
- New Column: Potential criminalization of traditional business relationships
- Around the web, January 27
- SOPA protests demonstrate the value of limited-government principles
- Felon voting, Santorum, and Romney
- New Podcast: James Copland and Andrew Wise discuss 'honest services' fraud post-Skilling and the Kevin Ring trial
 |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
 |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |
