A Texas developer sued Carla Main and Encounter Books, an author and publisher respectively of a book criticizing the eminent domain practices he used—as well as Richard Epstein, who had the audacity to blurb the book. Fortunately, Texas law has procedural protections for victims of SLAPP suits, including interlocutory appeal when the trial court denies summary judgment, and an appellate court found there was no libel to be had. (This case was key in prompting Texas to pass anti-SLAPP legislation.) But there are dozens of other states where those who criticize the rich face tremendous risk of meritless libel suits to shut down their free speech rights, demonstrating the need for federal anti-SLAPP legislation. [Olson; Sullum @ Reason; IJ; Reporters' Committee; Dallas Observer; D Magazine; Main v. Royall (Tex. App. Jul. 25, 2011) (h/t W.C.)]
Free speech victory in Texas: "A great day for the First Amendment"
- In the Matter of McCutcheon: The Merits of Campaign-Finance "Aggregation"
- Teen Sexting, Youthful Mistake or Felony?
- M&A challenges and attorneys' fees
- Courts beginning to reject M&A strike suits
- Ninth Circuit refuses to extend Caronia
- Ahmed v. McDonald's
- Richard Epstein: The Supreme Court's Mischievous Environmental Easement
- Class action settlements in the news
- Annals of meritless cause litigation
- Richard Epstein: Takings Law, Without a Theory
- More on Caronia
- United States v. Caronia
- Michael Mann sues conservative critics for libel
- Richard Epstein: The Supreme Court's tortured takings jurisprudence
- More on Texas anti-coupon law
Center for Legal Policy at the