One-A-Day branded vitamins makes a gummy vitamin—but a serving size is two gummies. "Plaintiff Brad Howard sued Bayer and Bayer HealthCare LLC in November, saying the use of the One-A-Day brand constituted a violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and an express warranty." Howard complained that he thought he was buying a product where one gummy was one serving, notwithstanding the nutritional label to the contrary. Arkansas federal judge D. P. Marshall Jr. wasn't impressed and threw the case out: "No reasonable consumer... would be deceived." The case is Howard v. Bayer Corp., No. 4:10-cv-1662 (E.D. Ark.). [Law360 ($)]
Bad observational humor does not equal consumer fraud claim
- Around the web, April 11
- What does the Baylor Law data leak tell us about affirmative action?
- Prospective injunctive relief class actions and McNair v. Synapse Group Inc.
- Apple iPhone 4 bumper class action settlement
- Around the web, March 13
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Apple class actions
- 0.1% claim rate in "successful" class action
- Around the web, February 21
- "A Public Letter From the Cobell Lawyers Prompts Ethics and Harassment Concerns"
- Around the web, January 27
- Where are the aggressive class action defense lawyers?
- Frankel on Baer race quota orders
- CCAF Second Circuit brief in Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
- Around the web, December 15
Center for Legal Policy at the