It seems an obvious application of choice-of-law principles, given Shutts, but the Toyota MDL judge has finally precluded the frivolous economic-loss class action claim that California law applies to the entire nationwide class. The Bloomberg Business Week article quotes POL's own Michael Krauss. Meanwhile, the lead plaintiffs' lawyer makes his putative clients worse off by continuing to insist contrary to scientific evidence that there is a product defect: at this point, the sole cause of any economic loss by the class is the continued insistence by plaintiffs' lawyers that there is something wrong with Toyotas.
Out-of-state Toyota economic loss class action plaintiffs can't borrow California law
- New Jersey creates new cause of action for texting
- Joe Nocera nails it
- "New Study: U.S. Legal System Is World's Most Costly"
- Deep pockets files: California concrete thrower
- What does a $1.1B class action settlement have in common with Gilad Shalit's rescue?
- Toyota settles shareholder suit over sudden acceleration hysteria
- HRT punitive damages before Pennsylvania Supreme Court
- Medical malpractice reform in New Hampshire
- Around the web, April 11
- $2.7 billion nanny-state regulation
- Behind the paywall
- Bluetooth ripples: Collado v. Toyota
- Around the web, August 11
- Roundup, July 18
- Counterproductive CAFE regulations
Center for Legal Policy at the