In CSX Transp. v. McBride, Justice Thomas joined the four justices from the liberal wing of the Court to agree to a broad plaintiff-friendly interpretation of the Federal Employers' Liability Act and whether it required a showing of proximate causation before liability would be imposed, in an opinion written by Justice Ginsburg. Chief Justice Roberts wrote a dissent, arguing that the majority opinion was confusing language abrogating contributory negligence with a diversion from the common-law principle of proximate cause. "[T]he causation test the Court embraces contains no limit on causation at all."
Another data point on that pro-business Supreme Court
Related Entries:
- New Podcasts: The constitutionality of Obamacare
- Obamacare Debate Complete: The participant with the most compelling argument was...
- Sackett v. EPA
- Coming next week: featured discussion on PPACA
- A small victory against the EPA
- New Podcasts: Making sense of the court order in Kiobel
- Kiobel debate complete
- New Featured Discussion: Kiobel and corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute
- Supreme Court hears argument on Stolen Valor Act
- Compucredit v. Greenwood
- Wherein George Soros wastes his money
- The myth of the pro-business Supreme Court (continued)
- The expense of the death penalty
- Alex Tabarrok on medical patents
- Reuters releases innovative SCOTUS tracking tool
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Bridget Carroll Press Officer, Manhattan Institute bcarroll@manhattan-institute.org |



