As the authors of Toyota Under Fire point out on the Harvard Business Review blog (via W.O.), there is only one "sudden acceleration" accident that can be attributed to Toyota, the case of a local dealer that improperly installed an SUV floor mat into a Lexus sedan, causing the accelerator to get stuck and kill several people. Nevertheless, a trial-lawyer-created panic has resulted in a trial-lawyer-created litigation over the "economic loss" from that panic, and the district court has refused to dismiss the suit, notwithstanding the complete refutation of the conspiracy theory of electronic defect. [NLJ]
Refutation of Toyota sudden acceleration hysteria doesn't stop Toyota sudden acceleration litigation
- Around the web, April 11
- What does the Baylor Law data leak tell us about affirmative action?
- Apple iPhone 4 bumper class action settlement
- Around the web, March 13
- Plaintiffs' lawyers protect their cartel by bringing antitrust suit
- Apple class actions
- 0.1% claim rate in "successful" class action
- Around the web, February 21
- Behind the paywall
- "A Public Letter From the Cobell Lawyers Prompts Ethics and Harassment Concerns"
- Around the web, January 27
- Where are the aggressive class action defense lawyers?
- Frankel on Baer race quota orders
- CCAF Second Circuit brief in Blessing v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
- Around the web, December 15
Center for Legal Policy at the