There's a famous Schoolhouse Rock about how a bill becomes a law, but it doesn't apply in New Jersey, where the state supreme court has taken the position that it controls the pursestrings and the state constitution requires an additional $500 million in spending on schools—ironic, since the state constitutional language used to justify the move was merely the vague adjectives "thorough and efficient." The 3-2 Abbott v. Burke decision shows the importance of judicial appointments in preventing judicial aggrandizement; Governor Christie's nominee was blocked, and the liberal chief justice appointed the liberal swing vote. [Bader @ Examiner; Corner]
Not so much separation of powers in New Jersey
Related Entries:
- Deep pocket files: Scott Simon and Harding Pharmacy
- New podcasts from the Manhattan Institute
- Maryland high court: allergy is disability requiring accommodation
- What media bias? Freddie Mac edition
- "Porsche girl" lawsuit update
- Obama State of the Union speech
- Where Newt's wrong--and where he's right
- Life imitates parody department
- Hans Bader on the student loan disaster
- Trask on Prakash
- Around the web, December 15
- Dog bites man story: Democrat-dominated Fourth Circuit more liberal now
- H.R. 1996: Government Litigation Savings Act
- Around the web, October 14
- The 53%
![]() |
| Isaac Gorodetski Project Manager, Center for Legal Policy at the Manhattan Institute igorodetski@manhattan-institute.org |
![]() |
| Laura Eyi Press Officer, Manhattan Institute leyi@manhattan-institute.org |



