There's a famous Schoolhouse Rock about how a bill becomes a law, but it doesn't apply in New Jersey, where the state supreme court has taken the position that it controls the pursestrings and the state constitution requires an additional $500 million in spending on schools—ironic, since the state constitutional language used to justify the move was merely the vague adjectives "thorough and efficient." The 3-2 Abbott v. Burke decision shows the importance of judicial appointments in preventing judicial aggrandizement; Governor Christie's nominee was blocked, and the liberal chief justice appointed the liberal swing vote. [Bader @ Examiner; Corner]
Not so much separation of powers in New Jersey
- The Ramifications of EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P.
- Update on BAMN
- The Bond That Ties: A Case-Study in Federalism
- Two podcasts
- The hidden weight on our educational system
- The Discordant Nature of Education Policy: When the Means Don't Quite Fit the Ends
- New Jersey creates new cause of action for texting
- Supreme Court Ethics Act of 2013
- Jewish or Asian and rejected by Berkeley undergrad?
- A hidden argument for deregulation
- Accutane recusal motion update
- "Supreme Court case involves medical malpractice awards, Medicaid"
- Annals of meritless cause litigation
- More on Bork
- Robert Bork, 1927-2012