Subscribe Subscribe   Find us on Twitter Follow POL on Twitter  



Gameshow justice: Godwin v. Electrolux Home Prods.

The Abnormal Use blog points us to a quack expert report hypothesizing that a defective (rather than unattended) stove caused a fire that destroyed a home, defeating summary judgment, and likely leading to a settlement between the stove manufacturer and the home-owner's fire insurance. The subrogee likely won the battle, but insurance companies (and consumers as a whole) lose the war when they encourages nonsensical litigation unrelated to the facts for short-term profit. A collective action problem, to be sure.

Related Entries:



Rafael Mangual
Project Manager,
Legal Policy

Manhattan Institute


Published by the Manhattan Institute

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for Legal Policy.